<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://jccj.in/2026/06/22/transnational-constitutional-rights-rights-limitation-positive-obligations-and-remedies-in-india-azerbaijan-and-the-europeancourtof-human-rights/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-06-22T16:29:46+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>TRANSNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: RIGHTS-LIMITATION, POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS, AND REMEDIES IN INDIA, AZERBAIJAN, AND THE EUROPEAN COURTOF HUMAN RIGHTS</news:title></news:news></url><url><loc>https://jccj.in/2026/06/22/omprakash-v-radhacharan-justice-denied/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-06-22T16:08:21+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>OMPRAKASH V. RADHACHARAN-JUSTICE DENIED</news:title></news:news></url><url><loc>https://jccj.in/2026/06/22/public-morality-as-a-censoring-tool-the-changing-notions-of-morality-in-uk-usa-andindia/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-06-22T15:32:22+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>PUBLIC MORALITY AS A CENSORING TOOL: THE CHANGING NOTIONS OF MORALITY IN UK, USA AND INDIA</news:title></news:news></url><url><loc>https://jccj.in/2026/06/22/right-discourse-and-utility-discourse/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-06-22T15:24:31+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>RIGHT DISCOURSE AND UTILITY DISCOURSE</news:title></news:news></url><url><loc>https://jccj.in/2026/06/22/what-is-law-a-grand-question-without-a-grandanswer/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-06-22T14:55:55+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>WHAT IS LAW: A GRAND QUESTION WITHOUT A GRANDANSWER</news:title></news:news></url><url><loc>https://jccj.in/2026/06/22/constitutional-conventions-and-their-importance-under-the-indian-constitution-a-critical-analysis/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-06-22T14:49:05+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS AND THEIR IMPORTANCE UNDER THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS</news:title></news:news></url></urlset>
